But it also undermines the psychology of skeptical inquiry upon which autonomous judgment and resistance to manipulation are founded. In the book, he focuses on China as although they have been successful so far in placing a political clamp against democracy are exceedingly unable to block western culture from swamping China because they have become main players in globalization. For anyone who understands the historical development of European nations, this book will be tired. Barber’s analysis of how savage capitalism and forces of those who haven’t been able to reap the comfortable fruits of it fight back is still very much worth reading. Late capitalism is no longer about either products or competition. The International Petroleum Encyclopedia Tulsa: Translated into English this means ring as many permanent workers as possible and eliminating their costly bene t and pension packages.

Today there is no tribe, no faction or splinter group or neighborhood gang, that does not aspire to self-determination. Interdependence is not some foreign adversary against which citizens need to muster resistance. Paul Kennedy, David Calleo, and other pessimists have concluded that the American epoch, scarcely half a century long, is over. It too pro ts from the arrogant pretense of claims to national sovereignty that turn out to be indefensible. Imagine bin Laden without modern media: How could anyone cheer such acts?

Kurds, Basques, Puerto Ricans, Ossetians, East Timoreans, Quebecois, the Catholics of Northern Ireland, Catalans, Tamils, and of course, Palestinians- people with countries, inhabiting nations not their own, seeking smaller worlds within borders that will seal them off from modernity. Relevant even 10 years after publication.

Jihad vs. McWorld by Benjamin R. Barber

How could the myth of independence survive September 11? Yet an environment of despairing rage exists in too many places in the third world as well as in too many third-world neighborhoods of rst-world cities, enabling terrorism by endowing it with a kind of quasilegitimacy it does not deserve. Add to that social media’s general shrinking of the world and expanding of our ability to socialize.

We have to face the fact that jobs that can be offshored will thedis offshored and nothing we can thsis will change that.

Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism’s Challenge to Democracy

What I did enjoy was that the majority of the book was solid and packed with inquisitions into where we are headed in terms of globalization and democracy. Until recently this sector has been regarded as the engine of all developed economies. Smaller countries have also lost even nominal sovereignty over their businesses. By McWorld, he means a varient of the Marxist idea of hegemonic power, though it is not connected to an individual nation-state, but rather driven by multi-national corporate entities.


If you own the copyright to this book and it is wrongfully on our website, we offer a simple DMCA procedure to remove your content from our site. For instance, cutting down a jungle will upset the overall oxygen balance, which affects our “global lungs”. South Africa, Serbia, Iran, Israel, Chile, Argentina, and, until recently, even Cuba have at di erent times weathered embargoes with remarkable equanimity; many have sustained economic growth with the help of market exchanges that simply do not respond to coercive national policies or international law.

A subtle warning against stereotyping or an unsubtle example of it? It is now the American right of Donald Trump that attacks free trade, common currencies, outsourcing and offshoring, open borders, the media, elites, and so on. Shklar—who feared Jihad, distrusted McWorld, and, ever so carefully, worked to clear a space for freedom and democracy.

Was America ever really a safe haven in the tainted streams of world history? I can accept that there are some similarities between some of these cultural aspects, and their effect on the nation-state can be similar to that of “McWorld”, but the author takes the point too far.

Jihad vs. McWorld

It is only the sobering choice juhad, on the one hand, a relatively legitimate, democratic, and useful interdependence which, however, is still to be constructed and which leaves sovereignty in tatters and, on the other tgesis, a radically illegitimate and undemocratic interdependence on the terms of criminals, anarchists, and terrorists an interdependence that is already here and which will triumph in the absence of a democratizing political will.

In the new McWorld of global sales, the trademark has surpassed the sales item and the image has overtaken the product as the key to earned income. Once the images changes, then Hollywood films will change and thus American cultural images will change too. The author sees laissez-faire economics as responsible for a rise in tribalism within societies what he jihaf terms “jihad” and excessive individualism and consumerism “McWorld”.

jihad vs mcworld thesis statement

But alongside wild capitalism rage the reactionary forces of wild terrorism. After September 11, mcworlld critics even tried to lump the antiglobalization protesters in with the terrorists, casting lump the antiglobalization protesters in with mfworld terrorists, casting them as irresponsible destablizers of world order.


From this constrained, short-term perspective, citizenship, ethnicity, and job status as well as other rival forms of identity are at best irrelevant, at worst, obstacles to be overcome. In the selling of America as a means to selling American goods, advertising has itself become big business on a global scale.

jihad vs mcworld thesis statement

We can have a democratic and useful interdependence on whatever common ground we can persuade others to stand on, or we can stand on the brink of anarchy and try to prevent criminals and terrorists from pushing us into the abyss. The last twenty years have seen this concept play out countless times and although I haven’t read the book in this century, I feel that it will remain insightful for those looking to gain thess understanding of our c At the time I read this book soon after it was published in Barber’s concepts were new to me, His main premise in the book is that the opposing forces of tribalism and consumerism are creating a tension in the world that leads to interesting and often volatile consequences.

Terrorism’s Challenge to Democracy Home Jihad vs.

Children are our terrorists-to-be because they are so obviously not our citizens-to-come. Jihad and McWorld can co-exist in fact, jihad might be impossible without the technology of McWorld but the true victim of this struggle is democracy, to which both forces are opposed.

Rather than inciting action through his writing, the author enumerates everything he dislikes about Western civilization indeed, Earth as a whole as an attempt at elucidating the dichotomy that is Jihad vs. You must drink because it makes you feel your choice: I like Barber conclusion of how to stop the forces of McWorld and Jihad from further destabilizing Democratic institution of a nation-state.

What need have they for anything but blood and memory? It was the interdependence of America with the world and the interdependence of shared economic and technological systems everywhere on which the Jihadic warriors counted when they brought terror to the American homeland.